Stride for Survival: Can Rahul’s Journey Reshape Congress’s Future?

Will Rahul Gandhi’s plan to repeat what Mahatma did, be successful in 2022?

In a Healthy Democracy, the ruling party and the opposition have a responsibility to the country and surely the people will judge them in discharging that responsibility. ~R VENKATARAMAN

Can Power Be Captured Through Gandhian Methods?

In modern Indian history, Padayatras (long foot marches) have played a significant role, especially in politics. Mahatma Gandhi made the most successful and impactful use of this method.

His Dandi March (1930) against British rule remains one of the most powerful examples of nonviolent resistance.

Even today, Indian politicians try to associate themselves with Gandhi’s ideas and methods. His influence on Indian politics is undeniable, and his legacy continues to shape public movements.

But the big question remains—can political power be won through Gandhian methods today?

Gandhi’s approach was based on truth, nonviolence, and mass mobilization. It worked against a colonial power, where moral pressure and public participation played a huge role. However, in modern electoral politics, winning power requires strategy, organization, and strong leadership. While mass movements can influence public opinion, converting that into electoral success is not always guaranteed.

Gandhian methods can still create waves, but whether they can bring about a complete political change depends on public support, leadership, and the ability to translate ideals into action.

Walking for Change Bharat Jodo Yatra

What is Bharat Jodo Yatra?

Bharat Jodo Yatra means “Unite India March.” The Congress party calls it a movement and is urging people across the country to join.

Congress claims that inflation is high, unemployment is rising, and divisive forces are threatening national unity. They say this yatra is an effort to bring people together and address these issues.

There are also discussions about increased violence against minorities and women. Congress accuses the central government of favoring big businesses and ignoring common people’s problems.

However, such allegations are common in every democracy. Opposition parties always criticize the ruling party, no matter what.

The Purpose of Bharat Jodo Yatra According to Congress

The Congress Party believes that the present government has failed on every front. It claims that inflation is at its peak, unemployment is rampant, and divisive forces threaten national unity. In response, Congress launched the Bharat Jodo Yatra, aiming to bring people together and address these pressing issues.

Discussions surrounding the yatra have also touched on rising incidents of violence against minorities and women. Congress accuses the central government of favoring capitalist interests over the common people. However, such allegations are common in democracies worldwide, where opposition parties frequently criticize those in power.


What Did Mahatma Gandhi Gain from the BIG WALK?

The most famous BIG WALK (padayatra) by Mahatma Gandhi was the Dandi March in 1930. He covered nearly 400 kilometers from Ahmedabad to Dandi in 24 days.

This march had two key purposes:

Symbolic Purpose: Breaking the British-imposed Salt Law as an act of civil disobedience.

Real Purpose: Gandhi aimed to reignite the independence movement and draw global attention to British imperialism.

    By the 1920s, Mahatma Gandhi was already a household name in India. He knew that his padayatra would be widely covered by both national and international media, helping him expose British rule on a global stage. The march successfully revitalized India’s independence movement.


    Will Rahul Gandhi’s Padyatra Yield Similar Results?

    While Congress may gain some traction among young voters through the Bharat Jodo Yatra, it remains uncertain whether this effort will significantly impact elections.

    Rahul Gandhi has also made conscious efforts to visit major temples along his route, attempting to counter allegations of Muslim appeasement while still appealing to minority voters.

    However, unlike Mahatma Gandhi’s Dandi March, which captured international headlines, the Bharat Jodo Yatra has struggled to attract mainstream media attention. Its discussions seem mostly confined to social media platforms.

    Additionally, Rahul Gandhi faces internal challenges within his party. Unlike Gandhi, who was a unifying leader, Rahul remains entangled in issues of dynastic politicsa factor that serves as both his greatest strength and his biggest weakness.

    Had the Bharat Jodo Yatra taken place a decade ago, it might have produced better results. However, in today’s digital age, mass movements no longer have the same impact. 

    Social media has artificialized political mobilization, making it difficult to generate real grassroots momentum.


    Bharat Jodo Yatra: A Closer Look at the Varanasi Event

    Congress organized the Bharat Jodo Yatra across major Indian cities, including Varanasi. I joined the rally for about five kilometers to observe it firsthand.

    Bharat Jodo Yatra or a Carnival of Senior Citizens?

    One major takeaway from the event was Congress’s disconnect with the youth. Unlike other political rallies, where young people are often at the forefront, this march was dominated by senior citizens.

    I did spot a few young attendees, but most had accompanied their fathers or grandfathers.

    This absence of youth is a serious warning sign for Congress. Without strong youth participation, the party risks fading further in future elections.

    If Congress does not take deliberate steps to engage young voters, it may struggle for survival in the coming years.

    While Bharat Jodo Yatra seeks to revive Congress’s presence, its actual impact remains highly uncertain.

    Political movements today demand more than just padayatra; they require a strong ideological foundation and a deep connection with the aspirations of the people—something Rahul Gandhi has yet to establish.

    From Ahimsa to Algorithms: Gandhi in the Age of Social Media

    Gandhi’s ideas have to be freed from the Gandhian mafia only then Gandhi’s ideas will remain meaningful.

    Mahatma Gandhi is widely known as the Father of the Nation in India. His leadership, commitment to non-violence and dedication to India’s independence struggle have left a lasting legacy.

    His principles of truth, non-violence, and social justice continue to inspire not only Indians but people around the world.

    Even after using the internet for about 14-15 years, I used to stay away from social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp. But two years ago, I created an account on social media due to pressure from my friends.

    Last year, on Gandhi Jayanti, I was shocked to see that social media was filled with vulgar jokes about Gandhi Ji. It made me think a lot and left me amazed at the disrespect.

    MAHATMA GANDHI

    The complex relationship between Mahatma Gandhi’s ideas and the current sentiment among the younger generation in India can be seen through various lenses.

    Firstly, it’s important to recognize that Gandhi’s values—non-violence, restraint, brotherhood, and his vision of Ram Rajya—were deeply rooted in his quest for social harmony and political independence.

    These principles have stood the test of time and continue to resonate with many. However, as the world and India itself have evolved, there has been a shift in the way these ideals are perceived by different generations.

    For the younger generation, there are several reasons why Gandhi's popularity might be challenged, despite his monumental contributions to India's independence:

    Changing Nationalism: The rise of more assertive nationalism in recent times, marked by a desire for a stronger, more self-reliant India, has led to a shift away from Gandhi’s ideas of passive resistance.

    Many of today’s youth view assertive action, military strength, and national pride as more important than the philosophy of non-violence.

    This shift, particularly in the context of India’s growing global influence, contrasts with Gandhi’s emphasis on peace and restraint.

    Disillusionment with Politics: The association of Gandhi’s legacy with the political establishment, particularly the Nehru-Gandhi family, has led some younger Indians to question the relevance of his ideas in today’s context.

    The perception that Gandhi’s legacy has been used or distorted by politicians for their gain has also affected his image, leading to feelings of disillusionment among those who feel disconnected from his philosophy.

    Perception of Weakness: Some critics argue that Gandhi’s stance on non-violence made India vulnerable in certain historical moments, and this perception is often magnified in the present scenario where youth, facing contemporary challenges, might desire stronger, more direct solutions. Nationalism today often ties itself with pride in military strength and assertive diplomacy, contrasting sharply with Gandhi’s non-confrontational methods.

    Economic and Technological Shifts: The focus on economic development, technological growth, and global competitiveness in India’s current narrative can sometimes overshadow Gandhi’s ideas about simple living, self-reliance, and rural empowerment.

    The Appeal of Strong Leadership: The growing preference for strong leadership and decisive action in India contrasts with Gandhi’s emphasis on dialogue, gradual change, and non-violence.

    As the country faces new challenges, some may feel that Gandhi’s methods of struggle no longer align with the political or social realities of the 21st century.

    The younger generation may be more inclined towards rapid modernization, and the slow, deliberate pace of Gandhi’s ideas might seem out of touch with these aspirations.

    The growing anger towards the Gandhi family and the Congress party in India has, unfortunately, been linked to Mahatma Gandhi's legacy. 

    Many people believe that the present Gandhi family, which claims to have inherited Mahatma Gandhi’s political legacy, is responsible for much of the country’s current struggles. They argue that this family was imposed on India due to Mahatma Gandhi’s influence, but rather than following his principles of simplicity, non-violence, and service to the nation, the family’s political actions have often seemed disconnected from those ideals.

    This perception has fueled resentment, with a significant section of the population holding the Gandhi family accountable for the country’s political and social turmoil, which has indirectly contributed to the diminishing respect for Mahatma Gandhi’s legacy.

    It is evident that in India, especially among the youth, there is no inherent resentment towards Gandhi and his ideals. However, the politicians who have built their petty political careers under the guise of Gandhi’s name have tarnished his legacy through their actions.

    The principles of truth, non-violence, and service to the nation that Gandhi stood for have been compromised by those seeking personal gain, leading to a distorted view of his legacy. The disillusionment is not with Gandhi himself but with those who have misused his name for their agendas.